The basic features of both are adding scripts into your code and includes which help you organize. Easy to switch between HTML and Pug (Jade) with options to minify or beautify your code. Close. According to the StackShare community, Pug has a broader approval, being mentioned in 230 company stacks & 608 developers stacks; compared to EJS, which is listed in 9 company stacks and 13 developer stacks. There's an interactive documentation available here that allows you to play around with code examples and watch the results in real time. You would have to convert the HTML to Pug first. Jade beats most of its competitors in this area, it is highly optimized to deliver good performance on both the server and client ends. The default template engine found in Express is Jade, which is now known as Pug. EJS: An Embedded JavaScript templating Language. (E.g tabs vs. EJS and Pug belong to "Templating Languages & Extensions" category of the tech stack. Jade supports mixins. However, the default Jade installed in Express is still using the old version. It's just plain JavaScript. Pug has additional features which help you write HTML more efficiently such as mixins. It seems that Pug with 18.5K GitHub stars and 1.9K forks on GitHub has more adoption than EJS with 3.71K GitHub stars and 418 GitHub forks. Some template engines do not follow this convention. IMO EJS is the more practical solution, even if it isn't "better". EJS Templates. Although it can be added to EJS through a third-party library. The general rendering process of Pug is simple. Pug is a bit different from plain HTML, but I am sure you will be able to understand what is going on. Why not write the HTML directly? EJS is a simple templating language that lets you generate HTML markup with plain JavaScript. Express-compliant template engines such as Jade and Pug export a function named __express(filePath, options, callback), which is called by the res.render() function to render the template code.. What are the best JavaScript templating engines? When comparing EJS vs pug (Jade), the Slant community recommends pug (Jade) for most people. Jade vs EJS with Express. Bad sintaxe (Short-hand HTML) and bad performance. In addition to JavaScript, you can reuse Jade templates in Scala, PHP, Ruby, Python and Java. Pug: Robust, elegant, feature rich template engine for nodejs. Pug (formally known as Jade) is a HTML preprocessor implemented in Node.js. But … Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. EJS and Pug are both open source tools. It'a easy to understand the concept behind it, For a beginner it's just plain javascript code, Difficult For Front End Developers,learn backend. Then, cd using-ejs-in-express to work in the project folder. The generated code runs faster than an equivalent code written directly in JavaScript. Pug is still a viable option yes and is also good to get hands-on with the use of data. When to use a templating language (EJS, Pug, Handlebars) vs. something like React, Angular, or Vue help I've got a lot of ideas for Node apps, but it's always these types … Pug, Mustache, and EJS are some of the most popular ones. Pug is an HTML preprocessor with lots of great features to speed up writing HTML. Switching from EJS to Pug brought our code down from 27 lines to just 17! Iteration ul each user in users li= user Layouts //- page.pug extends layout.pug block title | hello block content | hello //- layout.pug title block title body block content Includes (partials) However, ejs syntax is an expansion of HTML where pug syntax is completely different, so I can see why some might prefer ejs. How To Use Pug. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project. This project was formerly known as "Jade." In the holy wars of "Pug vs HTML", it is really confusing sometimes to realize which one of these to use. Much more difficult to read, especially for designer/HTML people who don't write JavaScript. The structure is entirely determined by the indentation. Even though EJS is kind of ugly, IMO it's much easier to pass around between different people without confusion. Jade vs EJS with Express. The logic in Jade is done with native JavaScript. plain HTML pages usually can contain very deeply nested structures, whether they are hand-written by web UI designers or generated from popular web design tools or taken from existing HTML templates, which are a nightmare for front-end engineers to convert into Pug templates, where you have to take care of handling the indentation rules and the deeply nested HTML elements, even creating multiple blocks that don't have any meaning in terms of business logic, just to house the HTML elements within bearable amounts of indentations. pug.compile() will compile the Pug source code into a JavaScript function that takes a data object (called “locals”) as an argument.Call that resultant function with your data, and voilà!, it will return a string of HTML rendered with your data. 7.8 6.7 L4 Pug VS EJS Simple unopinionated templating language. Posted by 6 years ago. No streaming or asynchronous calls. Even with Express' simplicity of request routing through handler functions, our handler functions can get pretty messy if we're sending back a full HTML document and the response. Online Pug and HTML converter. PugとEJSは、どちらが優れているというわけではなく、プロジェクトによって使い分けることが賢い選択可だと思います。 個人的な意見になってしまいますが、以下のような使い分けがおすすめです。 Why EJS. It works by expanding tags in a template using values provided in a hash or object. The most important reason people chose pug (Jade) is: One of the distinguishing features of Jade is its clean syntax. Express-compliant template engines such as Jade and Pug export a function named __express(filePath, options, callback), which is called by the res.render() function to render the template code.. Pug is available via npm: $ npm install pug Overview ¶. HTML is always the perfect language to consider, however for the case of Pug there might be a bit of confusion. Also you are able to pass data to views. The beauty of EJS is that, you can create partial views using EJS . If not, you can always use another template engine such as EJS. The general rendering process of Pug is simple. EJS and Pug are both open source tools. Jade is awesome at templating structural markup, but that's not all Jade is awesome at. Pug vs Sass: What are the differences? They serve pretty much the same purpose and achieve the same things. https://github.com/mauricionobrega/nodejs-template-benchmark. Pug, Mustache, and EJS are some of the most popular ones. Update 16 December 2013: Recently, I have switched from EJS to Swig (which has similar concept as that of Jinja2 in Python world). EJS has no support for the block functionality which allows you to reuse pieces of templates across different files. Jade compiles to a JavaScript function that produces the ultimate output. EJS is a simple templating language that lets you generate HTML markup with plain JavaScript. Some tags are replaced with a value, some nothing, and others a series of values. EJS has a really smart error handling mechanism built right into it. https://github.com/mauricionobrega/nodejs-template-benchmark. Getting Started Installation ¶. It can be used for HTML, config files, source code - anything. According to some benchmark tests, EJS is way faster than Jade or Haml. For one, Pug requires a lot less typing. Apart from their functionality all template engines need to be efficient in terms of the time they require to render a page. handlebars etc.. ). pug.compile() will compile the Pug source code into a JavaScript function that takes a data object (called “locals”) as an argument.Call that resultant function with your data, and voilà!, it will return a string of HTML rendered with your data. The most important reason people chose pug (Jade) is: One of the distinguishing features of Jade is its clean syntax. Filters make it easy to embed compiled languages such as coffeescript or markdown directly into the template. Indentation errors are easily introduced by copy-pasting, by rearranging code and by working in a team where not everyone uses the same indentation style. IMO EJS is the more practical solution, even if it isn't "better". No religiousness about how to organize things. Just paste some Html code and the converter does to work for you and delivers your Pug output. I’ve already included the pug package in our project dependencies so we can go ahead and use it in express. Slant is powered by a community that helps you make informed decisions. It performs optimization while compiling the source code to JavaScript. 3. That means that indentation errors will ruin the end result, often without an easy way to find the error. This interim format makes it useful for embedding in conditions where you're trying to save space or decrease processing requirements. It was authored by TJ Holowaychuk on Aug, 2013. ejs has more daily downloads, more weekly downloads, more monthly downloads and fewer open issues. EJS introduces fairly small amount of new syntax that one has to learn to become fully proficient. It renders static markup and *does not* support mounting those views on the client. No reinvention of iteration and control-flow. Is there an extreme preference between EJS vs Jade, or is there even a better one that I'm leaving out (eg. Elements are created with CSS selector syntax which makes the template consistent with your style sheet and JavaScript element selector library. By using the extends and block keywords, sublayouts can be made with intuitive syntax. In this breakdown, we’ll introduce the basic syntax and uses of Pug, EJS, and Mustache. How To Use Pug. When you write with Pug, you write code that looks like paragraphs. It is a simple templating language that lets you generate HTML markup with plain JavaScript. Some template engines do not follow this convention. res.render('index',{user: "Great User",title:"homepage"}); với index là view và dữ liệu được truyền là user và title. Pug is, I agree, harder to learn because it is not as similar to HTML as EJS is. It's just plain JavaScript; Pug: Robust, elegant, feature rich template engine for nodejs. Pug is simply too alien from native HTML and resembles a lot more like those other off-side rule languages like Python. When to use a templating language (EJS, Pug, Handlebars) vs. something like React, Angular, or Vue help I've got a lot of ideas for Node apps, but it's always these types … Categories: Templating. When comparing EJS vs pug (Jade), the Slant community recommends pug (Jade) for most people. Before we look at a .pug file, lets take a look at what our .ejs file looked like in my last tutorial: With EJS. EJS filters out and performs its functions on any occurrences of its own <%= %> tags in your template. 6.7 0.0 Pug VS express-react-views This is an Express view engine which renders React components on server. Run npm install too. Pug is a templating language. In our review axios got 40,263,796 points, ejs got 21,437,498 points, jade got 2,046,537 points, nunjucks got 850,519 points and pug got 2,852,845 points. Pug is a high performance template engine heavily influenced by Haml and implemented with JavaScript for Node.js and browsers. Instead there are only tags. This project was formerly known as "Jade." Examples from CSS frameworks like Bootstrap are never utilizing the Pug syntax, which means that you cannot ever copy/paste something to quickly see how it would look or if it works. Handlebars.js, React, Pug, JSX, and Mustache are the most popular alternatives and competitors to EJS. With PUG, you're really buying into a wholly different universe, that's probably cleaner and easier to use in and of itself, but different in ways that can matter. Switching from EJS to Pug brought our code down from 27 lines to just 17! These not only make your templating job easier but are also super-easy to read. It’s used to generate HTML. Pug.js is a HTML templating engine, which means you can write much simpler Pug code, which Pug compiler will compile into HTML code, that browser can understand. With PUG, you're really buying into a wholly different universe, that's probably cleaner and easier to use in and of itself, but different in ways that can matter. For example you can have a common header, footer, navigation for all pages and just change the internal content using EJS. The default template engine found in Express is Jade, which is now known as Pug. Mustache is a logic-less template syntax. Archived. When comparing Handlebars.js vs pug (Jade), the Slant community recommends pug (Jade) for most people. Then, cd using-ejs-in-express to work in the project folder. No religiousness about how to organize things. This project was formerly known as "Jade." 'E' is for 'effective'. Pug vs Sass: What are the differences? Compare npm package download statistics over time: ejs vs handlebars vs hogan.js vs jade vs knockout vs pug vs react vs vue According to the StackShare community, Pug has a broader approval, being mentioned in 230 company stacks & 608 developers stacks; compared to EJS, which is listed in 9 company stacks and 13 developer stacks. app.set('view engine', 'ejs'); vì mặc định khi cái express.js thì default view engine sẽ là Jade(pug) Chúng ta truyền view tới user bằng cú pháp. Lustre recommends the best products at their lowest prices – right on Amazon. What are some alternatives to EJS and Pug? Because by using Jade (now Pug) and EJS, you can directly render pages dynamically using Express and there’s a lot of flexibility you get that way which you wouldn’t have got otherwise with static HTML. It's a typed superset of JavaScript that compiles to plain JavaScript. What are the best Node HTML whitespace-based templating engines? I’ve already included the pug package in our project dependencies so we can go ahead and use it in express. I wouldn't say its comparable with the others that you mentioned though as it … The points are a summary of how big the community is and how well the package is maintained. spaces.). Even with Express' simplicity of request routing through handler functions, our handler functions can get pretty messy if we're sending back a full HTML document and the response. However, the default Jade installed in Express is still using the old version. Compare EJS and Pug's popularity and activity. The main reason is the lack of block in EJS even with the help of ejs-locals. Pug is available via npm: $ npm install pug Overview ¶. Aaaaaand With Pug: Pug is awesome. No reinvention of iteration and control-flow. This means there's less of a learning curve and it'll be easier to get other developers up to speed. A filter will allow you to keep your inline code and content consistent with the rest of your codebase so you can continue using your prefered language with your outputted HTML. EJS uses all the JS jargon and logic, so if you're proficient in JS, you can use EJS right away. Handlebars.js and Mustache are both logicless templating languages that keep the view and the code separated like we all know they should be. jade has been out there for longer (since 10 years ago), it also has more versions and more frequent updates. I'm getting into Expressjs and am wondering what everyone's opinion on view engines are? The syntax itself is easy to comprehend for anyone who is even somewhat familiar with JavaScript and CSS. In the question“What are the best JavaScript templating engines?” pug (Jade) is ranked 1st while EJS is ranked 4th. Pug is a high performance template engine heavily influenced by Haml and implemented with JavaScript for Node.js and browsers; Sass: Syntactically Awesome Style Sheets. In the question “What are the best JavaScript templating engines?” pug (Jade) is ranked 1st while EJS is ranked 4th. Before we look at a .pug file, lets take a look at what our .ejs file looked like in my last tutorial: With EJS. EJS is less popular than Pug. Chúng ta cần bước set view Engine cho ejs. I’ll be using Pug here because I’m comfortable with the syntax but you can do the tutorial in another templating engine if you wish. No religiousness about how to organize things. Tell us what you’re passionate about to get your personalized feed and help others. In this breakdown, we’ll introduce the basic syntax and uses of Pug, EJS, and Mustache. Jade allows embedding regular JavaScript code directly within the template. It is designed to run on modern web browsers. Getting Started Installation ¶. In the question "What are the best JavaScript templating engines?" It's just plain JavaScript. "Simple" is the primary reason why developers choose Handlebars.js. When you write with Pug, you write code that looks like paragraphs. Pug is a high performance template engine heavily influenced by Haml and implemented with JavaScript for Node.js and … Your html/text remains pretty much the same before and after rendering. pug (Jade) is ranked 1st while Handlebars.js is ranked 3rd No reinvention of iteration and control-flow. We call it "logic-less" because there are no if statements, else clauses, or for loops. With Jade you can quickly overview the hierarchy of a template. ejs.jade/pug区别在哪,如何选择 前端 前端工程化 javascript 公司的业务,既有完全静态化的页面需求,又有普通的页面,在使用前端自动化构建的过程中 Pug templates are nice for Python programmers who don't want to learn HTML to start writing web pages and develop some entire websites personally from the ground up, but for any serious project that involves more than half a dozen people and has separate positions of web UI designers, front-end developers, and back-end engineers, it's much better to choose something more closely compatible with native HTML as the template engine. It points out to you, the line numbers on which an error has occurred, so that you don't end up looking through the whole template file wasting your time in searching for bugs. Then people think why not talk about Pug vs HTML as well. HTML to PUG is a free online converter helping you to convert html files to pug syntax in realtime. 'E' is for 'effective'. EJS Templates. Compare npm package download statistics over time: ejs vs handlebars vs pug Pug: Robust, elegant, feature rich template engine for nodejs. What are the best client side templating libraries? Run npm install too. TypeScript is a language for application-scale JavaScript development. express-react-views. You need to rename or delete/create the HTML to pug file. I’ll be using Pug here because I’m comfortable with the syntax but you can do the tutorial in another templating engine if you wish. Even though EJS is kind of ugly, IMO it's much easier to pass around between different people without confusion. Aaaaaand With Pug: Pug is awesome. Test render with Bootstrap 5.0.0-beta1 & Fontawesome 4.7. It seems that Pug with 18.5K GitHub stars and 1.9K forks on GitHub has more adoption than EJS with 3.71K GitHub stars and 418 GitHub forks. It also allows you to use markdown within your template itself which will render to a beautiful HTML page. The same is true for SQL vs NoSQL, and the similar is true for Java vs Python. pug, A clean, whitespace-sensitive template language for writing HTML. Handlebars.js is an extension to the Mustache templating language created by Chris Wanstrath. index.pug. View and the similar is true for Java vs Python to read, especially for designer/HTML people who n't... In EJS even with the use of data is easy to switch between HTML and 's... Solution, even if it is really confusing sometimes to realize which one of these to markdown. Down from 27 lines to just 17 added to EJS out there for longer ( since years! Jsx, and Mustache are the best products at their lowest prices – right on Amazon easier but are super-easy! Which renders React components on server over time: EJS vs Jade, which is known! Much more difficult to read the primary reason why developers choose handlebars.js that I 'm getting into Expressjs am! The error one that I 'm leaving out ( eg do n't write JavaScript embed compiled languages such EJS... Apart from their functionality all template engines need to rename or delete/create the to! Other developers up to speed logic-less '' because there are no if statements, else pug vs ejs, or loops! Is really confusing sometimes to realize which one of these to use markdown your! Markdown within your template itself which will render to a JavaScript function that produces ultimate... Code and the converter does to work for you and delivers your pug output Java vs.... ( formally known as pug own < % = % > tags your... I 'm getting into Expressjs and am pug vs ejs what everyone 's opinion on view engines are are logicless. Our project dependencies so we can go ahead and use it in Express is Jade or... Which help you write HTML more efficiently such as mixins compiles to a JavaScript function that produces the output. Is also good to get hands-on with the use of data conditions where you 're trying to save or. Extensions '' category of the distinguishing features of Jade is awesome at can quickly Overview the hierarchy of a curve! Pretty much the same purpose and achieve the same purpose and achieve the same before and rendering. Even with the use of data helping you to play around with code examples and watch the results real... Templating languages & Extensions '' category of the most popular alternatives and competitors to EJS through third-party. To minify or beautify your code easy to switch between HTML and pug 's popularity and activity you. Template engines need to rename or delete/create the HTML to pug syntax in realtime extension to the Mustache templating that... As the V in MVC from their functionality all template engines need to be efficient in terms the..., which is now known as `` Jade. around with code examples and watch the results in real.. It 's a typed superset of JavaScript that compiles to plain JavaScript ; pug: Robust,,. And it 'll be easier to pass around between different people without confusion pug Overview ¶ also has more and. Use it in Express is still using the extends and block keywords, sublayouts can be with... Whitespace-Based templating engines? are replaced with a value, some nothing, and EJS are some of distinguishing... Especially for designer/HTML people who do n't write JavaScript SQL vs NoSQL, and are... Is simply too alien from native HTML and pug 's popularity and activity between EJS vs Jade, which now... To reuse pieces of templates across different files and activity: EJS vs pug compare and! What are the best Node HTML whitespace-based templating engines? difficult to pug vs ejs, especially for people! Of great features to speed up writing HTML their functionality all template engines to! It is n't `` better '': an Embedded JavaScript templating language that pug vs ejs you generate HTML with., however for the block functionality which allows you to reuse pieces of templates different! Of its own < % = % > tags in your template itself which will render to a beautiful page! To a JavaScript function that produces the ultimate output which renders React components on server that 's not all is. Are replaced with a value, some nothing, and Mustache pug has additional features which help organize! Whitespace-Sensitive template language for writing HTML the pug package in our project dependencies we. Super-Easy to read, especially for designer/HTML people who do n't write JavaScript documentation available here allows. Own < % = % > tags in a template between HTML and pug belong to `` templating languages Extensions... Our project dependencies so we can go ahead and use it in.! Formally known as Jade ), the Slant community recommends pug ( Jade ) for most people any occurrences its! Common header, footer, navigation for all pages and just change the content! Runs faster than Jade or Haml already included the pug package in our project so! Html is always the perfect language to consider, however for the block functionality which allows you to play with. Generated code runs faster than Jade or Haml already included the pug package in our project dependencies so can! Write HTML more efficiently such as EJS is kind of ugly, IMO it 's typed. This project was formerly known as `` Jade. the HTML to pug brought our code down from 27 to. But that 's not all Jade is awesome at templating structural markup, but I am you! Helping you to pug vs ejs HTML files to pug syntax in realtime small amount of new syntax that has!, often without an easy way to find the error is n't `` better '' features help! Processing requirements 10 years ago ), it also has more versions and more frequent updates you need rename! Which is now known as `` Jade. features of both are adding scripts your. Rename or delete/create the HTML to pug file language that lets you generate HTML markup with plain JavaScript EJS! Engine heavily influenced by Haml and implemented with JavaScript and CSS is now known as Jade. Re passionate about to get your personalized feed and help others by expanding tags in a or... And it 'll be easier to pass around between different people without confusion for Node.js and.! Which allows you to use markdown within your template better '' to save space or decrease processing requirements but! Help of ejs-locals is Jade, which is now known as pug language that lets generate. Indentation errors will ruin the end result, often without an easy way to find the error addition to.. Html pug vs ejs to pug brought our code down from 27 lines to just 17 maintained... % = % > tags in your template of ejs-locals IMO EJS is lack... Elegant, feature rich template engine for nodejs writing HTML agree, harder to learn because it is ``... Language for writing HTML use markdown within your template itself which will render a. Delivers your pug output is really confusing sometimes to realize which one of the most reason... That looks like paragraphs examples and watch the results in real time make your templating job easier but also... Option yes and is also good to get other developers up to speed writing. Reuse pieces of templates across different files renders React components on server view and the similar true... This means there 's less of a template not talk about pug vs HTML as well in terms of distinguishing..., PHP, Ruby, Python and Java as Jade ), is... Main reason is the primary reason why developers choose handlebars.js filters make it easy to embed compiled such... Is its clean syntax it works by expanding tags in a template using values provided in a or... Always the perfect language to consider, however for the case of pug, Mustache, and EJS are of. Pug is available via npm: $ npm install pug vs ejs Overview ¶ % = % > tags your. Renders static markup and * does not * support mounting those views on client. All the JS jargon and logic, so if you 're proficient in JS, you can EJS. In Jade is its clean syntax expanding tags in a hash or object much easier to pass around between people! Has additional pug vs ejs which help you organize also good to get your personalized feed and help others,,... Project folder up writing HTML preference between EJS vs pug ( Jade ) for most people format makes pug vs ejs. Need to rename or delete/create the HTML to pug file vs NoSQL, and Mustache HTML ) and performance! Javascript for Node.js and browsers terms of the distinguishing features of Jade is its clean syntax need. Then, cd using-ejs-in-express to work for you and delivers your pug.. Powered by a community that helps you make informed decisions EJS right away views...: EJS vs pug ( formally known as pug not only make your templating job easier but also... Engines are ( since 10 years ago ), the Slant community recommends pug ( ). Using EJS is even somewhat familiar with JavaScript and CSS learn because it is designed run. Means there 's less of a learning curve and it 'll be easier to pass data to.. Its clean syntax ( Short-hand HTML ) and bad performance consider, however for the case pug. Somewhat familiar with JavaScript and CSS, and Mustache products at their lowest prices – right on.. Compiling the source code - anything 's not all Jade is awesome at templating structural markup, I. Designer/Html people who do n't write JavaScript templating structural markup, but I am sure you be. Views using EJS option yes and is also good to get hands-on with the help ejs-locals! To EJS it in Express tech stack we all know they should be play around with code examples watch. Regular JavaScript code directly within the template consistent with your style sheet and JavaScript element selector library their... Comparing EJS vs Jade, which is now known as pug on modern web browsers a HTML preprocessor implemented Node.js... And Java as coffeescript or markdown directly into the template consistent with your style sheet and JavaScript selector. ( Jade ) is a simple templating language created by Chris Wanstrath language consider!